bouée de sauvetgae

Summer School

Présentation (fr)

Cette manifestation annuelle, qui rassemble une vingtaine de doctorants et des chercheurs confirmĂ©s en histoire de la pensĂ©e et philosophie Ă©conomiques, associe des objectifs de formation spĂ©cialisĂ©e, de confrontation des travaux des jeunes chercheurs et de sensibilisation Ă  des thĂ©matiques contemporaines de la thĂ©orie Ă©conomique. Son organisation la situe Ă  mi-chemin entre une universitĂ© d’étĂ© classique et un workshop, puisque la place qu’y occupe la recherche est centrale. L’universitĂ© d’étĂ© en histoire de la pensĂ©e Ă©conomique est aujourd’hui partie Ă©troitement associĂ©e Ă  l’European Society for the History of Economic Thought (ESHET) et inscrit PHARE comme organisateur institutionnel rĂ©gulier d’une manifestation scientifique au niveau europĂ©en.


L’UniversitĂ© d’ÉtĂ© joue un rĂŽle essentiel dans la structuration de sa discipline, l’histoire de la pensĂ©e Ă©conomique, tant au niveau de la formation Ă  la recherche doctorale (1) que de la recherche proprement dite (2).

(1) CrĂ©Ă©e en 1998, elle fut d’abord un dispositif de portĂ©e presque exclusivement hexagonale, associant les chercheurs de quelques laboratoires qui, en France, maintenaient une tradition de recherche en histoire de la pensĂ©e Ă©conomique : pour l’essentiel, dans les universitĂ©s de Paris 1, Evry, Lyon 2, Nice, Grenoble 2 et Strasbourg 1. En faisant appel Ă  des confĂ©renciers invitĂ©s français et Ă©trangers, les membres de son ComitĂ© scientifique s’efforçaient chaque annĂ©e, pendant la premiĂšre semaine de septembre, d’encadrer de jeunes doctorants en les conduisant Ă  intĂ©grer des niveaux d’exigence croissants vis-Ă -vis de leurs propres travaux. DĂšs la naissance de l’UniversitĂ© d’ÉtĂ©, il Ă©tait convenu que des Ă©tablissements diffĂ©rents en soient, Ă  tour de rĂŽle, les organisateurs. Cette rotation entendait dĂ©passer les clivages entre les UniversitĂ©s concernĂ©es en favorisant leurs collaborations sur un champ disciplinaire oĂč les chercheurs français Ă©taient particuliĂšrement prĂ©sents. Mais elle avait aussi pour objectif d’attirer des Ă©tudiants d’origines diverses et d’en favoriser la circulation. TrĂšs rapidement, cette organisation des UniversitĂ©s d’ÉtĂ©, oĂč la prĂ©sentation des recherches les plus avancĂ©es dans les diffĂ©rents domaines de l’analyse Ă©conomique et des sciences sociales se combine avec la discussion des travaux des doctorants, a rencontrĂ© un vif succĂšs.
Initialement destinĂ©e Ă  des Ă©tudiants français (1 seul Ă©tudiant Ă©tranger sur 81 participations de doctorants entre 1998 et 2001), l’UniversitĂ© d’ÉtĂ© s’est transformĂ©e en une manifestation europĂ©enne, sans vĂ©ritable Ă©quivalent sur le continent (37% de participation Ă©trangĂšre en moyenne sur les 4 derniĂšres annĂ©es) dans sa discipline. L’internationalisation qui s’en est suivie a touchĂ© tous les aspects de l’UniversitĂ© d’ÉtĂ© : la composition de son ComitĂ© scientifique, qui en constitue la cheville ouvriĂšre ; les universitĂ©s impliquĂ©es dans le processus ; les confĂ©renciers invitĂ©s ; la langue de travail ; les lieux d’organisation ; et jusqu’aux associations scientifiques qui lui ont apportĂ© leur soutien.


ComitĂ© scientifique. Des Professeurs d’autres universitĂ©s europĂ©ennes se sont progressivement joints au ComitĂ© scientifique permanent, qui a ainsi acquis une dimension europĂ©enne. En 2003, aprĂšs la premiĂšre attribution du label « UniversitĂ© EuropĂ©enne d’ÉtĂ© », en 2006, 2010 puis en 2012, ce ComitĂ© a intĂ©grĂ© de nouveaux membres de nationalitĂ©s allemande, espagnole, grecque, italienne, portugaise et turque.
UniversitĂ©s impliquĂ©es.  A cĂŽtĂ© de 4 UniversitĂ©s françaises (UniversitĂ©s Paris 1 PanthĂ©on-Sorbonne, Lille 1, Louis LumiĂšre Lyon 2, Nice Sophia-Antipolis et Strasbourg), 6 Ă©tablissements europĂ©ens sont aujourd’hui impliquĂ©s dans l’organisation de l’UniversitĂ© d’ÉtĂ© : l’UniversitĂ© de Rome Tor Vergata et l’UniversitĂ© de Thessalie Ă  partir de 2003, l’UniversitĂ© de Lisbonne Ă  partir de 2006, Middle-East Technical University d’Ankara, et l’UniversitĂ© de Hohenheim Ă  partir de 2012 et l’UniversitĂ© de Barcelone Ă  partir de 2023 (en remplacement de l’universitĂ© de Saragosse).


ConfĂ©renciers invitĂ©s. Les confĂ©renciers invitĂ©s reflĂštent, eux-aussi, cette dimension internationale : en 20 ans (pĂ©riode 1998-2017), sur les 136 confĂ©renciers provenant de 16 pays diffĂ©rents qui sont intervenus dans le cadre de l’UniversitĂ© d’ÉtĂ©, 70 Ă©taient Ă©trangers (51 %).
Langue de travail. DĂšs la premiĂšre annĂ©e d’existence, des confĂ©rences en anglais avaient Ă©tĂ© organisĂ©es. Cependant, la langue de travail des doctorants Ă©tait restĂ©e le français jusqu’en 2008, sauf pour les quelques doctorants Ă©trangers qui participaient Ă  cette manifestation, lorsqu’ils se trouvaient plus Ă  l’aise en anglais qu’en français. Ce n’est qu’à partir de 2008 et de l’organisation de l’UniversitĂ© d’ÉtĂ© hors de France que l’utilisation de l’anglais comme langue de travail a permis d’accueillir des Ă©tudiants non francophones en nombre croissant, en mĂȘme temps qu’elle ouvrait de nouvelles perspectives de collaborations Ă  l’international.

Localisation. En effet, aprĂšs avoir Ă©tĂ© organisĂ©e Ă  Paris en 2008, le ComitĂ© scientifique de l’UniversitĂ© d’ÉtĂ© a pris acte de son caractĂšre europĂ©en de plus en plus prononcĂ©. L’UniversitĂ© d’ÉtĂ© a ainsi Ă©tĂ© organisĂ©e hors de France pour la premiĂšre fois en 2009 (Volos, GrĂšce), puis rĂ©guliĂšrement par la suite : en Italie (Acqui Terme, 2010 ; CĂŽme, 2017 ; Turin, 2023) ; au Portugal (Lisbonne, 2011 ; Porto, 2019) ; en Turquie (Ankara, 2013) ; en Espagne (Saragosse, 2014) ; en Allemagne (Stuttgart, 2015), en GrĂšce de nouveau Ă  Volos en 2018. En moyenne, elle est organisĂ©e 1 fois sur 4 en France (Lille, 2012 ; CargĂšse, 2016 ; Paris, 2021 ; Strasbourg, 2022),
Soutiens des associations scientifiques. LĂ  encore, alors que l’UniversitĂ© d’ÉtĂ© Ă©tait initialement parrainĂ©e par la seule association française d’historiens de la pensĂ©e Ă©conomique (ACGPE, 1998), dĂšs l’instant oĂč son internationalisation a Ă©tĂ© amorcĂ©e, ce parrainage s’est successivement Ă©tendu Ă  des associations italienne (STOREP, 2010), espagnole et portugaise (AIHPE, 2011), europĂ©enne (ESHET, 2011), puis Ă  l’association allemande (AGW, 2012). Selon les annĂ©es et les lieux oĂč elle se dĂ©roule, ces associations participent au financement de l’UE.


Organisation. L’UniversitĂ© d’ÉtĂ© se dĂ©roule gĂ©nĂ©ralement fin aoĂ»t-dĂ©but septembre (en 2024, elle aura lieu du 2 au 6 septembre).  Elle offre aux participants trois types d’activitĂ© :
‱    des ConfĂ©rences animĂ©es par des chercheurs confirmĂ©s, français et Ă©trangers ;
‱    des Ateliers de prĂ©sentations de travaux par les Ă©tudiants ;
‱    un Tutorat recherche et publication visant Ă  appuyer les Ă©tudiants dans la prĂ©paration de leurs travaux en vue d’une publication.
Un Programme culturel est en outre organisé, afin de permettre aux enseignants et aux étudiants de bénéficier du patrimoine culturel de la région concernée, généralement en dehors des parcours touristiques habituels.


En dĂ©pit de quelques ajustements permettant d’adapter programme de travail et programme culturel, la structure-type de chaque journĂ©e est identique : la matinĂ©e est consacrĂ©e aux confĂ©rences thĂ©matiques (gĂ©nĂ©ralement deux, d’une heure et demie chacune) et l’aprĂšs-midi aux ateliers d’exposition et de discussion de travaux des Ă©tudiants (entre trois et six prĂ©sentations) ainsi qu’aux sĂ©ances de tutorat individualisĂ©. Le programme culturel a gĂ©nĂ©ralement lieu Ă  la mi-journĂ©e et en soirĂ©e.

 

(2) Du point de vue de la recherche proprement dite, un cycle de confĂ©rences est organisĂ© chaque annĂ©e. Les confĂ©rences sont articulĂ©es autour d’un thĂšme diffĂ©rent pour chaque UniversitĂ© d’ÉtĂ©. Depuis son internationalisation, les thĂšmes choisis ont, par exemple, Ă©tĂ© les suivants : ThĂ©ories du travail : Histoire et enjeux politiques (Volos, GrĂšce, 2009) ; Conflits et coopĂ©ration : les leçons de l’histoire et de la thĂ©orie Ă©conomique (Acqui Terme, Italie, 2010) ; Crises Ă©conomiques et crise de l’économie: histoire, thĂ©orie et politique (Lisbonne, Portugal, 2011) ; InĂ©galitĂ©s, pauvretĂ©, discriminations (Lille, France, 2012) ; Croissance et dĂ©veloppement : histoire, thĂ©orie et politique (Ankara, Turquie, 2013) ; Le ChĂŽmage et la Question Sociale (Saragosse, Espagne, 2014) ; La globalisation : passĂ©, prĂ©sent, futur (Stuttgart, Allemagne, 2015) ; Changements radicaux et transitions : L'Economie et ses relations avec d'autres disciplines (CargĂšse, France, 2016) ; L’évolution de la thĂ©orie Ă©conomique de la dĂ©cision individuelle (CĂŽme, Italie, 2017). Economie et Ă©quitĂ© : aspects thĂ©oriques, Ă©thiques et politiques (Volos, GrĂšce, 2018) ; L’économie appliquĂ©e et le dĂ©veloppement de nouveaux domaines en Ă©conomie (Porto, Portugal, 2019) ; Les relations de l’économie avec d’autres disciplines : Histoire et perspectives (Paris, France, 2021) ; L’inĂ©galitĂ© et la justice sociale en Ă©conomie et au-delĂ  (Strasbourg, France, 2022) ; L'Ă©volution de l'avenir de l'Ă©conomie : comment les donnĂ©es et les techniques, la spĂ©cialisation et les relations avec d'autres disciplines remodĂšlent la science Ă©conomique et le travail des Ă©conomistes (Turin, Italie, 2023).

Ces conférences permettent,


‱    Ă  des doctorants non nĂ©cessairement spĂ©cialistes de prendre connaissance de l’état de la recherche dans ces domaines et d’entrer en contact avec ceux qui y consacrent leurs activitĂ©s de recherche ;


‱    aux ‘sĂ©niors’ qui y participent d’entrer en contact avec d’autres collĂšgues et de dĂ©velopper ainsi des collaborations futures. C’est, par exemple, par le biais du travail rĂ©alisĂ© au cours des universitĂ©s d’étĂ© que PHARE a Ă©tĂ© approchĂ© en 2015 par l’ESHET afin d’organiser le colloque annuel de cette organisation – ce qui a Ă©tĂ© fait l’annĂ©e derniĂšre (mai 2016) – qui rĂ©unit environ 350 chercheurs de toutes nationalitĂ©s.


Les ateliers. Les contributions des doctorants aux ateliers sont sĂ©lectionnĂ©es selon des procĂ©dures analogues Ă  celles qui prĂ©valent habituellement dans l’organisation de colloques internationaux. On a, d’ailleurs, notĂ© une amĂ©lioration sensible de la qualitĂ© des travaux et de leur prĂ©sentation au fil des annĂ©es. Chaque prĂ©sentation, avec Powerpoint et, dĂ©sormais, en anglais, s’appuie sur un texte Ă©crit disponible pour tous les participants. Elle fait l’objet d’un commentaire par un rapporteur Ă©tudiant, qui s’initie, en rĂ©alisant parfois pour la premiĂšre fois un rapport sur la contribution d’un collĂšgue, Ă  un aspect encore nĂ©gligĂ© de son activitĂ© professionnelle Ă  venir. Au cours de la discussion qui suit, au moins un participant senior (confĂ©rencier ou membre du ComitĂ© scientifique) intervient systĂ©matiquement Ă  travers ses questions et commentaires. A travers les ateliers, l’universitĂ© d’étĂ© est donc organisĂ©e comme un colloque international.


Le tutorat. Le tutorat vise Ă  favoriser l’insertion acadĂ©mique des doctorants en les aidant Ă  rĂ©aliser leurs projets de publication, Ă  travers tant la mise en valeur de leur apport, que l’adaptation formelle de leur travail aux attentes Ă©ditoriales, ou que le choix du support appropriĂ©. Chaque doctorant est ainsi pris en charge par deux tuteurs, membres du comitĂ© scientifique ou confĂ©renciers invitĂ©s. Cela suppose, Ă©videmment, une grande disponibilitĂ© de la part des participants seniors, qui restent gĂ©nĂ©ralement prĂ©sents pendant toute la durĂ©e de l’UniversitĂ© pour les membres du Conseil Scientifique, et souvent plus de trois jours pour les confĂ©renciers invitĂ©s. De fait, ces ateliers ont permis – tout comme le font les colloques, de nouveau – Ă  de nombreux doctorants de finaliser leur article, aboutissant Ă  des publications dans les meilleures revues internationales en histoire de la pensĂ©e Ă©conomique.


RĂ©sultats. Depuis sa crĂ©ation en 1998, l’UniversitĂ© d’ÉtĂ© en Histoire, Philosophie et PensĂ©e Économiques a accueilli plus de 270 Ă©tudiants en provenance d’une vingtaine de pays, qui ont chacun assistĂ© en moyenne Ă  1,6 manifestations. Les indications dont nous pouvons disposer montrent que sur la pĂ©riode 1998-2011, 75% des Ă©tudiants ont soutenu leur thĂšse et obtenu leur doctorat (Ă©valuation basse). Toujours sur la mĂȘme pĂ©riode, la proportion de ces Ă©tudiants titulaires d’un doctorat occupant aujourd’hui une position acadĂ©mique (Professeur des universitĂ©s, MaĂźtre de ConfĂ©rences, Directeur de Recherches, ChargĂ© de Recherches ou emplois Ă©quivalents en France ou Ă  l’étranger) s’élĂšve Ă  47% (Ă©valuation basse).


ThĂ©matiques. La thĂ©matique retenue chaque annĂ©e pour les confĂ©rences invitĂ©es est liĂ©e aux domaines de recherche des Ă©quipes des organisateurs locaux – ce qui facilite la mobilisation des chercheurs de l’universitĂ© concernĂ©e et de leurs rĂ©seaux.
Enfin du point de vue de la participation des doctorants de Paris 1, chaque annĂ©e, ils forment le plus gros contingent des participants juniors : sur les cinq derniĂšres UniversitĂ©s d’étĂ© (2018-2023 – en raison de la pandĂ©mie, il n’y a pas eu de session organisĂ©e en 2020), ils reprĂ©sentent en moyenne 1/4 des effectifs (et un peu plus de la moitiĂ© des Ă©tudiant.es inscrit.es en thĂšse dans un Ă©tablissement français

Presentation (en)

Each year, at the end of August and beginning of September, PHARE is co-organizing the Summer School on History of Economic Thought, Economic History and Economic Philosophy, with the support of ESHET (European Society for the History of Economic Thought).

The School is held is different place each times and provides participants with a state of the art of current reflections on a specific topic, such as Fairness and the Economy (2018 - Greece), conflicts and cooperation (2010 - Italy) or Unemployment and the social question (2014 – Spain): it offers PhD students and young scholars specializing in economics, history of economics, economic methodology and related fields an overview of the evolution of the economic theory on these topics. The Summer school is also characterized by an interdisciplinary spirit: accordingly, the lectures aim at establishing links with recent developments on the topic in other fields, like sociology, psychology or philosophy.

Each student attending the school will present her/his research paper, which topic may differ from the Summer School’s one. The presentations are taking place in the presence of the members of the scientific committee and of some invited speakers attending the school, thus covering a broad area of expertise. Each presentation is discussed by another young scholar, followed by a question and answer session with the audience. In addition, individual tutorials are organized for each doctoral student with members of the committee or invited speakers.

Sessions précédentes et sessions à venir

       

Prochaine universitĂ© d’étĂ©  DE  PHARE 2024 Ă  Barcelone
Date : 02 au 06 septembre.
Thùme: “New approaches to economics”


                               â€œNew Perspectives in Economics, New Topics in History of Economics”

                       University of Barcelona – Faculty of Economics and Business, September 2 – 6, 2024



The 2024 ESHET Summer School in History of Economic Thought, Economic Philosophy, and Economic History will take place in Barcelona, organised by the Department of Economic History , Institutions, Policy and World Economy  of the Faculty of Economics and Business  of the  University of Barcelona and PHARE (University of Paris 1 - PanthĂ©on-Sorbonne), with the support of the UniversitĂ© Paris 1 PanthĂ©on-Sorbonne, the  European Society for the History of Economic Thought (ESHET), the Barcelona Economic Analysis Team (BEAT), the Centre d’Estudis Jordi Nadal d’HistĂČria EconĂČmica, the FundaciĂł Ernest Lluch, and the Associazione Italiana per la Storia dell’Economia Politica (STOREP).

 

The Summer School is open to Ph.D. students and young scholars (Ph.D. degree obtained after January 2022) in History of Economic Thought, Economic Philosophy, or Economic History. 18 proposals will be selected for presentation.

 

The general topic of the Summer School is “New Perspectives in Economics, New Topics in History of Economics”.

Alessandro Roncaglia (2019) depicted the evolution of Economics since the Second World War to our days as “the age of fragmentation”. He referred not only to the well-known diverse theoretical approaches, from Marginalism to New Keynesians, passing through all modern heterodoxies, but also to the new sub-fields that emerged and consolidated in Economics along these decades. Intensification in labour division in our discipline has given rise to new specialized sub-fields that have allowed enormous progressions in the analysis of economic phenomena from very different standpoints, even if, some argue, at the cost of losing the general picture – a charge made after the global meltdown of 2008, for instance by Krugman (2009) and Cardoso (2009). This diversification has been coupled with the rise of new methods of analysis, resulting in a set of varied and pluralistic approaches to the discipline. This process has been particularly intense in the past two decades. New challenges have been undertaken with new analytical tools, which not only have enriched the scientific panorama, but, to many scholars, have turned inescapable for a comprehensive understanding of present-day problems. The scientific community has blessed this evolution. A quick look to the list of the Nobel Prize in Economics in the last years allows reckoning a salutary mix of old and new topics and methods. The recent award to Claudia Goldin, an economic historian working on gender differences in the labour market, epitomises this trend. Others preceded her: Duflo, Banerjee and Kremer concentrated on the problem of poverty with an innovative experimental approach; Nordhaus integrated climatic change into long-run macroeconomics analysis; etc. Pluralism has not only permeated economic research, but is slowly – but steadily – expanding in the training of future economists at the undergraduate level.

Historians of economics have tracked these developments. Backhouse and Cherrier (2014) noted the deep change in economics since the seventies, towards applied work. Again Cherrier (2017) followed the changes in the JEL Codes system as the outcome not only of deep debates on the discipline itself and its methodology, but also of changing institutional and technological frameworks. JEL codes “point to the transformation of the subject matters of the discipline and the rise and fall of different approaches to economics” (2017, 547). Davies (2019) questioned whether specialisation in economics was causing it to become “an increasingly fragmented and diverse discipline with a continually rising number of niche-based research programmes and a declining role for dominant cross-science research programmes”. Trautwein (2022) has insisted on the fact that fragmentation has led the discipline to lose “the big picture”, while Fontana and Iori (2023) have analysed the fragmentation of the mainstream.

But historians of economics and economic philosophers have also welcomed diversification in topics and methods. Edwards’s (2020) analysis of History of Political Economy in the occasion of the fifty anniversary of the publication of its first article by A.W. Coats (entitled “Research Priorities in the History of Economics”), has shown that these “priorities” have indeed changed, essentially in the last decade: “The big difference between the earlier four decades and the 5th (2009-2018) is the shift of research interests toward recent economics, together with explicit concerns about the appropriate historiographic methods to do so” (2020, 19-20). Fragmentation in History of Economics has not come without cost either. Weintraub (2015) pointed out that dispersion makes it difficult for practitioners to deal with topics distant from their fields of research: “A historian of the modern re-emergence of classical liberalism may be quite unable to distinguish Turgot from Quesnay beyond vaguely recalling material taught in a survey course in the history of economic thought” (2015, 361). The proliferation of thematic and specific conferences beyond the classical meetings of historians of economics thought and philosophy of economics and methodology, plus the emergence of specialized workshops, summer schools, etc. have aided in this process of diversification. A search into the main journals in our sub-disciplines confirms a renewal in research subjects, showing the concern of scholars – especially young – for diversity in topics and methods. Ecological economics, feminist economics, experimental economics, the circular economy, sharing economy, economic ideas from the global South, etc. have become the target for many of our colleagues, closely trailing frontier research in Economics. Working in the slippery terrain of inter-disciplinary borders, and used to a vast range of methodological approaches, they may well have a comparative advantage to better understand the economy in this era of fragmentation.

This Summer School therefore proposes a reflection on how the proliferation of new perspectives and subjects in Economics is mirrored in the research topics of historians of economics, economic philosophers and methodologists. It encourages participants to examine the effects of the fragmentation of the economic science on our particular areas of inquiry, observing the reaction of our community to the increasing diversity in Economics, but also to discuss how to preserve their autonomy and specificity. This proposal would come to complement that of last Summer School edition, which focused on data and techniques for research. This evolution in the economic science is highly relevant to young researchers in our sub-fields, as they will have to deal with a new scientific panorama, and find their place and speak with loud voice. This furnish new opportunities to make original contributions. The works by Bach (2021) on the economy of India, Orozco and Betancourt (2022) on the institutionalization of feminist economics, or Franco and Missemer (2023) on ecological economics, are a few examples of the immense potentiality of new topics in our disciplines. It is a time of change in Economics, its topics for research enlarged, its methodologies revisited, its borders called into question. This is challenging and appealing to our community. * (see References below).

Important remark: Lectures given by senior scholars will deal mostly with these issues, but there is no specific theme for students’ presentations. Ph.D. students and young scholars are thus invited to send proposals on any topic in the History of Economic Thought, Economic Philosophy, and Economic History.

 

Guest Speakers

The Organizing committee and the Summer School Scientific committee select invited speakers based on their areas of expertise. The list of speakers for this Summer school are renowned experts (titles are indicative):

    ‱ Elodie Bertrand, UniversitĂ© Paris 1 PanthĂ©on-Sorbonne, “Commodification studies: (how) do some markets endanger democracy and justice?”

    ‱ Alfonso Herranz LoncĂĄn, University of Barcelona, “Latin America in the Southeast Asian Mirror: Two Centuries of Economic Development”

    ‱ Juan MartĂ­nez Alier, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Holberg Prize 2023, “Land, Water, Air and Freedom. The Making of World Movement for Environmental Justice”

    ‱ Begoña PĂ©rez Calle, University of Saragossa, TBA

    ‱ Estrella Trincado Aznar, Complutense University of Madrid, “New Perspectives in HET on the interdisciplinarity between Science, innovation and economics”

    ‱ Speaker 6, TBA

 

Structure of the Program

    ‱ Lectures on topics related to the main topic of the summer school

    ‱ Students’ presentation and discussion

    ‱ Tutorials

Lectures delivered by invited speakers are of around one-hour duration. Speakers can take part in tutorials offered to students.

Students’ presentations will be organized in groups of three papers on open themes, chosen on the basis of their fields of research, in the presence of the members of the scientific committee and of invited speakers. Each presentation will be commented on by a discussant, chosen among young scholars, followed by a discussion with the floor.

Tutorials with senior researchers help Ph.D. students to prepare their research works for further diffusion and publication.

 

Applications

Contributions will be selected from extended abstracts in English of 500 to 1000 words, or full-paper proposals of up to 7500 words. Abstracts (or full papers) must be sent, together with a CV and a letter of recommendation from a supervisor, to Javier San Julian Arrupe: jsanjulian@ub.edu

Registration fees: 120 euros (double room) or 180 euros (single room). Participants are expected to make their own travel arrangements and pay for their travel costs. Fees include accommodation in Colegio Mayor Universitario Penyafort of the University of Barcelona (5 nights, check-in September 2, check-out September 7) and daily breakfast and lunch.

The deadline for abstract submissions is June 16th, 2024.

Notification of acceptance: June 30th 2024

Full paper submission deadline: August 18th 2024.

Deadline for Registration: July 15th 2024.

 

The Venue

The Summer school will be held at the Faculty of Economics and Business of the University of Barcelona, Av. Diagonal 696, 08034, Barcelona. The Colegio Mayor Universitario Penyafort is within walking distance to the venue, in Av. Diagonal 639.

 

Local Organizing Committee

Guillermo Antuña Martínez (PhD student, University of Barcelona, Spain)

Tristan Ferreira Rocha (PhD student, University of Barcelona, Spain)

Alfonso Herranz LoncĂĄn (Professor, University of Barcelona, Spain)

Marc Prat Sabartés (Associate Professor, University of Barcelona, Spain)

Javier San JuliĂĄn Arrupe (Associate Professor, University of Barcelona, Spain)

Nathalie Sigot (Professor, Université Paris 1, France)

Marta Serra (Administration, University of Barcelona, Spain)

 

Scientific Committee

Çinla Akdere (Associate Professor, Middle East Technical University, Turkey)

Richard Arena (Professor, Université de Nice-Sophia-Antipolis, France)

José Luís Cardoso (Professor, Universidade de Lisboa, Portugal)

Harald Hagemann (Professor, UniversitÀt Hohenheim, Germany)

Herrade Igersheim (CNRS Research Professor, Université de Strasbourg, France)

André Lapidus (Professor, Université Paris 1, France)

Jean-Sébastien Lenfant (Professor, Université Paris 1, France)

Paolo Paesani (Professor, UniversitĂ  degli Studi di Roma Tor Vergata, Italy)

Javier San JuliĂĄn Arrupe (Associate Professor, University of Barcelona, Spain)

Nathalie Sigot (Professor, Université Paris 1, France)

Michel Zouboulakis (Professor, University of Thessaly, Greece)

 

 

* References

Bach, Maria. 2021. “A Win-Win Model of Development: How Indian Economics Redefined Universal Development from and at the Margins”. Journal of the History of Economic Thought 43 (4), 483-505.

Backhouse, Roger & Cherrier, BĂ©atrice. 2014. “Becoming applied: The transformation of economics after 1970”. The Center for the History of Political Economy WP Series 2014-15.

Cardoso, JosĂ© LuĂ­s. 2009. “The crisis and the adaptive discourse of economists”. First Next Future Research Workshop on “Responses to the Crisis”, Calouste Gulbenkian Foundation, Lisboa.

Cherrier, Beatrice. 2017. “Classifying Economics: A History of the JEL Codes”. Journal of Economic Literature 55 (2): 545-579.

Coats, A.W. 1969. “Research Priorities in the History of Economics”. History of Political Economy 1 (1): 9-18.

Davis, John B. 2019. “Specialization, fragmentation, and pluralism in economics”. The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought 26 (2), p. 271-293.

Edwards, JosĂ©. 2020. “Fifty Years of HOPE: Changing Priorities in the Historiography of Economics”. History of Political Economy 52 (1): 1-46.

Espinel, C. & Gomez Betancourt, R. 2022. “A history of the institutionalization of feminist economics through its tensions and founders”. History of Political Economy 54 (1), 159-192.

Fontana, Magda & Iori, Martina. 2023. “The Fragmentation of the Mainstream and Communication in Economics: A View from the Top”, ƒconomia 13 (2), p. 323-355.

Franco, Marco P. Vianna & Missemer, Antonio. 2023. A History of Ecological Economic Thought. Routledge.

Krugman, Paul. 2009. “How did economists get it so wrong?” The New York Times, Sep. 6, 2009.

Roncaglia, Alessandro. 2019. The Age of Fragmentation. A History of Contemporary Economic Thought. Cambridge, Cambridge UP.

Trautwein, Hans-Michael. 2022. “Globalization, Fragmentation and the Evolution of Economic Thinking”. The Review of Keynesian Studies, 4, p. 1-20.

Weintraub, E. Roy. 2015. “HOPE Surveys of Recent Scholarship in the History of Economics.” History of Political Economy 47 (3): 361–62.


 

 

UNIVERSITÉ D’ÉTÉ 2023


Turin, 28 août-1er septembre 2023

“The evolving future of economics.
How data and techniques, specialization, and other disciplines are reshaping
the dismal science and economists’ work”


 
conférenciers :


John B. Davis (Emeritus Professor, Marquette University and University of Amsterdam): Change in and changing economics.

Francesco Saraceno (Professor, Deputy Department Director at OFCE-Sciences Po, Paris and UniversitĂ  LUISS, Roma): Macroeconomics, Eurozone Macroeconomics, and Eurozone Macroeconomic Governance.

Alberto Baccini (Professor, UniversitĂ  di Siena): Who are the Gatekeepers in Economics?

Marina Della Giusta (Professor, UniversitĂ  di Torino): Gender Bias and (in) Economics

Angela Ambrosino (Assistant Professor, UniversitĂ  di Torino): Is Institutional Economics Becoming Fashionable Again?

Alain Marciano (Professor, Université de Montpellier): Institutions, Economics, and Law

 

 

STRASBOURG 2022

24th Summer School in History of Economic Thought, Economic Philosophy and Economic History

“Inequality and social justice in economics and beyond”

 

Strasbourg, August 29 - September 2  2022

University Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne

 

PROGRAMME

 

COMITÉ D’ORGANISATION

  • Rodolphe Dos Santos Ferreira (BETA, UniversitĂ© de Strasbourg)
  • Ragip Ege (BETA, UniversitĂ© de Strasbourg)
  • Philippe Gillig (BETA, UniversitĂ© de Strasbourg)
  • Virginie Gouverneur (BETA, UniversitĂ© de Haute-Alsace)
  • RĂ©my Guichardaz (BETA, UniversitĂ© de Strasbourg)
  • Herrade Igersheim (BETA, UniversitĂ© de Strasbourg)
  • Eva Jacob (BETA, UniversitĂ© de Strasbourg)
  • Ivan Mitrouchev (BETA, UniversitĂ© de Strasbourg)
  • Sylvie Rivot (BETA, UniversitĂ© de Haute-Alsace)
  • Nathalie Sigot (PHARE, UniversitĂ© Paris 1)

COMITÉ SCIENTIFIQUE

  • Çinla Akdere (Assistant Professor, Middle East Technical University, Turkey)
  • Richard Arena (Professor, UniversitĂ© de Nice-Sophia-Antipolis, France)
  • JosĂ© LuĂ­s Cardoso (Professor, Universidade de Lisboa, Portugal)
  • Harald Hagemann (Professor, UniversitĂ€t Hohenheim, Germany)
  • Herrade Igersheim (CNRS Research Professor, UniversitĂ© de Strasbourg, France)
  • AndrĂ© Lapidus (Professor, UniversitĂ© Paris 1, France)
  • Jean-SĂ©bastien Lenfant (Professor, UniversitĂ© Paris 1, France)
  • Jean-Pierre Potier (Professor, UniversitĂ© LumiĂšre Lyon 2, France)
  • Annalisa Rosselli (Professor, UniversitĂ  degli Studi di Roma Tor Vergata, Italy)
  • Alfonso Sanchez Hormigo (Professor, Universidad de Zaragoza, Spain)
  • Nathalie Sigot (Professor, UniversitĂ© Paris 1, France)
  • Michel Zouboulakis (Professor, University of Thessaly, Greece)

 

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    PARIS 2021

23rd Summer School in History of Economic Thought, Economic Philosophy and Economic History

“Economics in relation to other disciplines: history and perspectives”

 

Paris, August 30 - September 3  2021

University Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne

 

COMITÉ D’ORGANISATION

  • Victor Bianchini (Phare – Associate Professor, UniversitĂ© Paris 1 PanthĂ©on-Sorbonne) 
  • Laurie BrĂ©ban (Phare – Associate Professor, UniversitĂ© Paris 1 PanthĂ©on-Sorbonne)
  • AndrĂ© Lapidus (Phare –Professor, UniversitĂ© Paris 1 PanthĂ©on-Sorbonne)
  • François Morvan (Phare - Research Engineer, UniversitĂ© Paris 1 PanthĂ©on-Sorbonne)Nathalie Sigot (Phare – Professor, UniversitĂ© Paris 1 PanthĂ©on-Sorbonne). 

COMITÉ SCIENTIFIQUE

  • Çinla Akdere (Assistant Professor, Middle East Technical University, Turkey)
  • Richard Arena (Professor, UniversitĂ© de Nice-Sophia-Antipolis, France)
  • JosĂ© LuĂ­s Cardoso (Professor, Universidade de Lisboa, Portugal)
  • Harald Hagemann (Professor, UniversitĂ€t Hohenheim, Germany)
  • Herrade Igersheim (CNRS Research Professor, UniversitĂ© de Strasbourg, France)
  • AndrĂ© Lapidus (Professor, UniversitĂ© Paris 1, France)
  • Jean-SĂ©bastien Lenfant (Professor, UniversitĂ© Paris 1, France)
  • Jean-Pierre Potier (Triangle –Professor, UniversitĂ© LumiĂšre Lyon 2, France)
  • Annalisa Rosselli (Professor, UniversitĂ  degli Studi di Roma Tor Vergata, Italy)
  • Alfonso Sanchez Hormigo (Professor, Universidad de Zaragoza, Spain)
  • Nathalie Sigot (Professor, UniversitĂ© Paris 1, France)
  • Michel Zouboulakis (Professor, University of Thessaly, Greece)

Paris 2021